<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Git Side Benefit: Reducing Disk Usage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://justaddwater.dk/2009/01/17/git-side-benefit-reducing-disk-usage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://justaddwater.dk/2009/01/17/git-side-benefit-reducing-disk-usage/</link>
	<description>Instant Usability &#38; Web Standards</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 13:44:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: justaddwater.dk &#124; Using Git for SVN Repositories Workflow</title>
		<link>http://justaddwater.dk/2009/01/17/git-side-benefit-reducing-disk-usage/comment-page-1/#comment-545542</link>
		<dc:creator>justaddwater.dk &#124; Using Git for SVN Repositories Workflow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justaddwater.dk/?p=1014#comment-545542</guid>
		<description>[...] the last months I have been using Git to work with my Subversion repositories. Besides from reducing disk usage, Git also makes my work slightly faster and independent of network access &#8212; I can make [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the last months I have been using Git to work with my Subversion repositories. Besides from reducing disk usage, Git also makes my work slightly faster and independent of network access &#8212; I can make [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: subbarao</title>
		<link>http://justaddwater.dk/2009/01/17/git-side-benefit-reducing-disk-usage/comment-page-1/#comment-513664</link>
		<dc:creator>subbarao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 11:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justaddwater.dk/?p=1014#comment-513664</guid>
		<description>Hey guys, I want to know the exact procedure used by git to reduce disk usage i.e. the algorithm used by it to store changes. Any suggestions ???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey guys, I want to know the exact procedure used by git to reduce disk usage i.e. the algorithm used by it to store changes. Any suggestions ???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://justaddwater.dk/2009/01/17/git-side-benefit-reducing-disk-usage/comment-page-1/#comment-494115</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justaddwater.dk/?p=1014#comment-494115</guid>
		<description>See https://git.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/GitSvnComparison
They say there that GIT version of Mozilla repository is 420 MB instead of 12 GB in SVN. 
But that&#039;s the remote repository, which does not really matter to me :-)
What matters to me is that when I download it to my machine, with GIT I have to download the entire 420 MB :-( while with SVN only a snapshot of the latest sources.
Distributed VCSs are good for large decentralized projects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See <a href="https://git.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/GitSvnComparison">https://git.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/GitSvnComparison</a><br />
They say there that GIT version of Mozilla repository is 420 MB instead of 12 GB in SVN.<br />
But that&#8217;s the remote repository, which does not really matter to me :-)<br />
What matters to me is that when I download it to my machine, with GIT I have to download the entire 420 MB :-( while with SVN only a snapshot of the latest sources.<br />
Distributed VCSs are good for large decentralized projects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesper Rønn-Jensen</title>
		<link>http://justaddwater.dk/2009/01/17/git-side-benefit-reducing-disk-usage/comment-page-1/#comment-476803</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesper Rønn-Jensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 09:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justaddwater.dk/?p=1014#comment-476803</guid>
		<description>@Jeet i follow your thoughts but the repositories I tested with above actually shows a disk usage reduction.

The biggest SVN repository above had more than 16,000 commits and the Git version was 40% smaller even though it contained the entire project history.

So even though that the svn repositories here are only snapshots in time (the history remains on the server), there is a significant difference. 

BTW, the Git repos also only contains differences between each revision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jeet i follow your thoughts but the repositories I tested with above actually shows a disk usage reduction.</p>
<p>The biggest SVN repository above had more than 16,000 commits and the Git version was 40% smaller even though it contained the entire project history.</p>
<p>So even though that the svn repositories here are only snapshots in time (the history remains on the server), there is a significant difference. </p>
<p>BTW, the Git repos also only contains differences between each revision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeet</title>
		<link>http://justaddwater.dk/2009/01/17/git-side-benefit-reducing-disk-usage/comment-page-1/#comment-468318</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justaddwater.dk/?p=1014#comment-468318</guid>
		<description>I am not entirely sure about git reducing the disk usage, since it has to keep &#039;whole&#039; copies of the commits, I am inclined to think that total size required by a well used git repository would be higher than svn/cvs repository that will only keep differences.

Might try something locally before I can conclude.. but yeah, I have switched to git already :))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not entirely sure about git reducing the disk usage, since it has to keep &#8216;whole&#8217; copies of the commits, I am inclined to think that total size required by a well used git repository would be higher than svn/cvs repository that will only keep differences.</p>
<p>Might try something locally before I can conclude.. but yeah, I have switched to git already :))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

