Comments on: Actual Browser Sizes (final)

By: Hur stor får en webbsida vara? | anvandbart.se

Hur stor får en webbsida vara? | anvandbart.se — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 07:45:11 +0000

[...] Via justaddwater.dk [...]

By: KAVodov

KAVodov — Tue, 16 Oct 2007 09:03:14 +0000

stast of different display resolutions (its global stats):

1024×768 45.4%

1280×1024 28.7%

1280×800 8.4%

800×600 5.0%

1152×864 3.9%

1440×900 2.1%

other 1.8%

1680×1050 1.4%

1400×1050 0.9%

240×320 0.7%

1600×1200 0.7%

1920×1200 0.3%

640×480 0.1%

By: Usability á íslensku » Hversu stór má vefsíða vera?

Usability á íslensku » Hversu stór má vefsíða vera? — Mon, 13 Nov 2006 11:32:44 +0000

[...] Rannsóknin byggir á upplýsingum frá vefum tískufyrirtækja, 60% gesta voru frá Evrópu og 30% frá bandaríkjunum. Heimild: justaddwater.dk [...]

By: justaddwater.dk | Design for Browser Size — Not Screen Size

justaddwater.dk | Design for Browser Size — Not Screen Size — Wed, 08 Nov 2006 22:14:40 +0000

[...] Update 2006-11-08: Baekdal has published numbers (hard evidence) on browser size. And a fun research video too. See “Actual Browser Sizes (final) [...]

By: Håkan Reis

Håkan Reis — Tue, 31 Oct 2006 21:50:35 +0000

I got similar results from my, highly un-scientific, research. It landed close to 800-900 witdth but around 900 height.

One question though, is the width from the fact that most sites are best viewed at 800 width or is it that it works out best at that resolution? Maybe with better flowing column layouts that adapt to wider viewing this would change.

Currently most sites are either unreadable at greater widths or they just show a big band of white space in full size.