<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Browser Size &#8212; Actual Numbers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://justaddwater.dk/2006/09/02/browser-size/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://justaddwater.dk/2006/09/02/browser-size/</link>
	<description>Instant Usability &#38; Web Standards</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 13:44:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Autocamp Split</title>
		<link>http://justaddwater.dk/2006/09/02/browser-size/comment-page-1/#comment-390664</link>
		<dc:creator>Autocamp Split</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 23:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justaddwater.dk/2006/09/02/browser-size/#comment-390664</guid>
		<description>I have 24 inch display and I never maximize the one window. On 1920*1200 resolution I can open 2 windows and see both content. Most of the today websites are developed to be seen on 1024*768.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have 24 inch display and I never maximize the one window. On 1920*1200 resolution I can open 2 windows and see both content. Most of the today websites are developed to be seen on 1024*768.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Piotr</title>
		<link>http://justaddwater.dk/2006/09/02/browser-size/comment-page-1/#comment-12934</link>
		<dc:creator>Piotr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 13:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justaddwater.dk/2006/09/02/browser-size/#comment-12934</guid>
		<description>Funny thing with the browser size things.... 

I think its more a issue needing to be communicated to the &quot;outside&quot; of the web-develompment &amp; expert society, than with in it. 

Most of us have tried and erroed the 800x600 design, by not having it fit the browser.. The big issue is that the decision makers have not. The don´t always seem to understand that just because someone told them about 1024x768, that is not the area usable by the web page itself…

Just like trying to convince them not to use millions of  $ for SEO, when their website leaks visitors like bucket shot to sh**t with a assault shotgun.
They don’t seem to get it … yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny thing with the browser size things&#8230;. </p>
<p>I think its more a issue needing to be communicated to the &#8220;outside&#8221; of the web-develompment &amp; expert society, than with in it. </p>
<p>Most of us have tried and erroed the 800&#215;600 design, by not having it fit the browser.. The big issue is that the decision makers have not. The don´t always seem to understand that just because someone told them about 1024&#215;768, that is not the area usable by the web page itself…</p>
<p>Just like trying to convince them not to use millions of  $ for SEO, when their website leaks visitors like bucket shot to sh**t with a assault shotgun.<br />
They don’t seem to get it … yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Baekdal</title>
		<link>http://justaddwater.dk/2006/09/02/browser-size/comment-page-1/#comment-12058</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Baekdal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 20:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justaddwater.dk/2006/09/02/browser-size/#comment-12058</guid>
		<description>Jesper, Thanks for the link.

I just want to point out that I am not actually saying that &quot;people with big screens rarely maximize&quot;. What I am saying is that in general terms people browse maximized.

It might very well be that the few people who browse above 1600px do so differently than everyone else.

(We will see in November when the final report is done)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesper, Thanks for the link.</p>
<p>I just want to point out that I am not actually saying that &#8220;people with big screens rarely maximize&#8221;. What I am saying is that in general terms people browse maximized.</p>
<p>It might very well be that the few people who browse above 1600px do so differently than everyone else.</p>
<p>(We will see in November when the final report is done)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bildschrimaufl�sung anpassen - Javascript @ tutorials.de: Forum - Tutorials - Hilfe - Schulung</title>
		<link>http://justaddwater.dk/2006/09/02/browser-size/comment-page-1/#comment-11833</link>
		<dc:creator>Bildschrimaufl�sung anpassen - Javascript @ tutorials.de: Forum - Tutorials - Hilfe - Schulung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Sep 2006 08:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justaddwater.dk/2006/09/02/browser-size/#comment-11833</guid>
		<description>[...] AW: Bildschrimaufl�sung anpassen     Die Bildschirmaufl�sung eines Benutzers ist eigentlich v�llig irrelevant. Denn diese sagt nichts �ber die Fenstergr��e aus, welche wiederum nichts �ber die tats�chliche Gr��e des Darstellungsfelds des Browsers aussagt. Doch letzterer Wert l�sst sich auch ermitteln. Lies dir mal „Browser Size“ von Jesper R�nn-Jensen sowie „The importance of window-width“ von Simon Collison durch. Letzterer hat diese Thematik �brigens auch in seinem Layout verwedet, sodass die dritte Spalte nur bei ausreichend Platz eingeblendet wird.    __________________ Markus Wulftange�Simple is good. Simplier is better.� Heute im Angebot: �Daring Fireball� T-Shirt [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] AW: Bildschrimaufl�sung anpassen     Die Bildschirmaufl�sung eines Benutzers ist eigentlich v�llig irrelevant. Denn diese sagt nichts �ber die Fenstergr��e aus, welche wiederum nichts �ber die tats�chliche Gr��e des Darstellungsfelds des Browsers aussagt. Doch letzterer Wert l�sst sich auch ermitteln. Lies dir mal „Browser Size“ von Jesper R�nn-Jensen sowie „The importance of window-width“ von Simon Collison durch. Letzterer hat diese Thematik �brigens auch in seinem Layout verwedet, sodass die dritte Spalte nur bei ausreichend Platz eingeblendet wird.    __________________ Markus Wulftange�Simple is good. Simplier is better.� Heute im Angebot: �Daring Fireball� T-Shirt [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

