<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ten reaffirmations from London @media 2006</title>
	<atom:link href="http://justaddwater.dk/2006/06/25/ten-reaffirmations-from-london-media-2006/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://justaddwater.dk/2006/06/25/ten-reaffirmations-from-london-media-2006/</link>
	<description>Instant Usability &#38; Web Standards</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 13:44:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: OutperformingYourself</title>
		<link>http://justaddwater.dk/2006/06/25/ten-reaffirmations-from-london-media-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-489023</link>
		<dc:creator>OutperformingYourself</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 17:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justaddwater.dk/2006/06/25/ten-reaffirmations-from-london-media-2006/#comment-489023</guid>
		<description>I partially Agree with Andy Clarke, Web designing should change from its old patterns and standards but it needs to change along with the old patterns. It has to transform into a new level of designing with the positive effects from the past. In my point of view then it will be much more effective and attractive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I partially Agree with Andy Clarke, Web designing should change from its old patterns and standards but it needs to change along with the old patterns. It has to transform into a new level of designing with the positive effects from the past. In my point of view then it will be much more effective and attractive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miadeo</title>
		<link>http://justaddwater.dk/2006/06/25/ten-reaffirmations-from-london-media-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-435387</link>
		<dc:creator>Miadeo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 13:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justaddwater.dk/2006/06/25/ten-reaffirmations-from-london-media-2006/#comment-435387</guid>
		<description>I agree with Peter. Interfaces should be standards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Peter. Interfaces should be standards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forensics</title>
		<link>http://justaddwater.dk/2006/06/25/ten-reaffirmations-from-london-media-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-430617</link>
		<dc:creator>Forensics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 04:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justaddwater.dk/2006/06/25/ten-reaffirmations-from-london-media-2006/#comment-430617</guid>
		<description>I think W3C is still important, but I doubt the Goog counts that as high as it once did, especially seeing as most major websites are not W3C compliant.

I also agree that the Javascript years are coming - or Web 2.0 years in general.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think W3C is still important, but I doubt the Goog counts that as high as it once did, especially seeing as most major websites are not W3C compliant.</p>
<p>I also agree that the Javascript years are coming &#8211; or Web 2.0 years in general.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Childrens Bikes</title>
		<link>http://justaddwater.dk/2006/06/25/ten-reaffirmations-from-london-media-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-430176</link>
		<dc:creator>Childrens Bikes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 20:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justaddwater.dk/2006/06/25/ten-reaffirmations-from-london-media-2006/#comment-430176</guid>
		<description>I disagree with London Sightseeing Tours, there is nothing easy about incorporating W3C standards. Small, medium and large sites with any slightly tedious functionality will struggle to made a site W3C compliant. We all see lots of sites that are XHTML, CSS compliant but very rare do you see others. I was impressed that Virgin Atlantics site is W3C compliant so it is possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with London Sightseeing Tours, there is nothing easy about incorporating W3C standards. Small, medium and large sites with any slightly tedious functionality will struggle to made a site W3C compliant. We all see lots of sites that are XHTML, CSS compliant but very rare do you see others. I was impressed that Virgin Atlantics site is W3C compliant so it is possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: London Sightseeing Tours</title>
		<link>http://justaddwater.dk/2006/06/25/ten-reaffirmations-from-london-media-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-423420</link>
		<dc:creator>London Sightseeing Tours</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 20:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justaddwater.dk/2006/06/25/ten-reaffirmations-from-london-media-2006/#comment-423420</guid>
		<description>Personally speaking W3C standards are quite easy to incorporate but when so many of the BIG corporate sites fail so regularly to be W3C compliant it sets a bad example. I am currently going through my sites making them WCAG compliant and its a big task for me so I can understand why they dont as its going to take a lot of work and therefore a huge cost which wont be gained back... I think. ;o)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally speaking W3C standards are quite easy to incorporate but when so many of the BIG corporate sites fail so regularly to be W3C compliant it sets a bad example. I am currently going through my sites making them WCAG compliant and its a big task for me so I can understand why they dont as its going to take a lot of work and therefore a huge cost which wont be gained back&#8230; I think. ;o)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://justaddwater.dk/2006/06/25/ten-reaffirmations-from-london-media-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-417070</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 11:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justaddwater.dk/2006/06/25/ten-reaffirmations-from-london-media-2006/#comment-417070</guid>
		<description>I disagree with Andy Clark. Escaping from that traditional software like interfaces, doesn&#039;t make design more usable. Peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with Andy Clark. Escaping from that traditional software like interfaces, doesn&#8217;t make design more usable. Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nate koechley</title>
		<link>http://justaddwater.dk/2006/06/25/ten-reaffirmations-from-london-media-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-8385</link>
		<dc:creator>nate koechley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 00:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justaddwater.dk/2006/06/25/ten-reaffirmations-from-london-media-2006/#comment-8385</guid>
		<description>I has made my slides available here: http://nate.koechley.com/blog/2006/07/12/my_atmedia_2006_slides/

cheers,
nate</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I has made my slides available here: <a href="http://nate.koechley.com/blog/2006/07/12/my_atmedia_2006_slides/">http://nate.koechley.com/blog/2006/07/12/my_atmedia_2006_slides/</a></p>
<p>cheers,<br />
nate</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sólo échale agua &#8226; Grancomo</title>
		<link>http://justaddwater.dk/2006/06/25/ten-reaffirmations-from-london-media-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-8295</link>
		<dc:creator>Sólo échale agua &#8226; Grancomo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jul 2006 08:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justaddwater.dk/2006/06/25/ten-reaffirmations-from-london-media-2006/#comment-8295</guid>
		<description>[...] Tras mi cambio profesional, mantengo el contacto con ellos, al compartir intereses comunes. El pasado junio, me invitaron a postear en Just Add Water un resumen @Media 2006: Ten Reaffirmations from London @media 2006. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tras mi cambio profesional, mantengo el contacto con ellos, al compartir intereses comunes. El pasado junio, me invitaron a postear en Just Add Water un resumen @Media 2006: Ten Reaffirmations from London @media 2006. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: revoluser.com - URLs will save the world</title>
		<link>http://justaddwater.dk/2006/06/25/ten-reaffirmations-from-london-media-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-6979</link>
		<dc:creator>revoluser.com - URLs will save the world</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 20:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justaddwater.dk/2006/06/25/ten-reaffirmations-from-london-media-2006/#comment-6979</guid>
		<description>[...] See more on my post Ten reaffirmations from London @media 2006  Technorati Tags: accessibility atmedia usability [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See more on my post Ten reaffirmations from London @media 2006  Technorati Tags: accessibility atmedia usability [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

